<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save the Developers Lost to Microsoft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekfreeq.com/save-developers-lost-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekfreeq.com/save-developers-lost-microsoft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.geekfreeq.com/save-developers-lost-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekfreeq.com/?p=402#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Ah, good point. Your theory sounds most likely. I couldn&#039;t agree with you more about doing them a favor. Why wouldn&#039;t MS want all of their users on the latest version? It would make everyone&#039;s life easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good point. Your theory sounds most likely. I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more about doing them a favor. Why wouldn&#8217;t MS want all of their users on the latest version? It would make everyone&#8217;s life easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://www.geekfreeq.com/save-developers-lost-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>BC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekfreeq.com/?p=402#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I think since they were using the IE logo that Microsoft got them on some sort of copyright infringment lawsuit or something of that nature that gave MS the right to have the URL redirected to the IE page.  Sad though since they were actually doing them a favor by having people upgrade their browser to the newest version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think since they were using the IE logo that Microsoft got them on some sort of copyright infringment lawsuit or something of that nature that gave MS the right to have the URL redirected to the IE page.  Sad though since they were actually doing them a favor by having people upgrade their browser to the newest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
