SecureSwitch Grows Up on Google Code
I recently posted about an update to my WebPageSecurity module project to the newly named SecureSwitch. One of the best ways to ramp up coding on the project again is to get it into a public code repository.
Get with Git?
I thought about using Git on GitHub, but I want to get moving on this and that would not be the case if I had to fumble through learning Git now. Although, I do really like the concept of a distributed version control system (DVCS). Instead, I will stick with Subversion (SVN) for now.
Google Code
That lands the project in the capable arms of Google Code, which I find to be a very nice new home for SecureSwitch. I will likely have a dedicated page here on GeekFreeq for SecureSwitch that refers visitors to the project on Google Code, and/or I will just pipe updates from the project site here via RSS.
Anyway, this is the first stage of a “grown-up” SecureSwitch.
Tags: .NET, ASP, development, products, Security
Posted in Security, Web Development | 2 comments; continue the discussion »
WebPageSecurity becomes SecureSwitch
After a bit of a struggle supporting my WebPageSecurity module on Code Project, I’ve decided to put some quality effort into the project in the very near future. One of the first things that needed attention was the name.
What’s in a Name?
Could I have named it something more generic all those years ago? Perhaps, but not likely. After a few minutes of running through some of the key nouns and verbs that describe the project’s purpose, it will now be known as SecureSwitch.
Educational Value vs. Quality Functionality
Another change to the project will be the maintenance of the dual source code languages. Since I originally started the module, a distinct project for C# and VB.NET have been maintained. While this was great for the educational aspect of the article and accompanying code, it is not ideal for a quality “product”.
After some consideration, I decided to drop the VB.NET version of the source code in favor of a single project written in C#. An immediate benefit to the community of this decision is faster releases.
What’s Next?
All of this change should be balanced with something to make it all worth while. I intend on stopping development on the 2.x version of the module for .NET 1.1 where it is now. Of course, I’ll fix any bugs, but no new features will likely be added. Version 3.x for .NET 2.0 will continue until version 4.0. That’s when I will add some of the new features in the queue and enable full support for ASP.NET MVC as well.
Keep checking back for more progress on this project.
Tags: .NET, ASP, development, products, Security
Posted in Security, Web Development | No comments yet; your thoughts are welcome »
How To: Send a Bulk E-mail Considerately
If you send bulk e-mails (i.e. messages to several contacts), you really should be considerate of your recipients. While you know (hopefully) all of the contacts in the “To” list of the message you are about to send, there’s a good chance that all of them do not know each other.
A considerate bulk mail sender (that’s you), should respect your contacts’ privacy. Listing all of your receiving contacts in the “To” field reveals their e-mail addresses to each other. That could be thought of as plain rude! In addition, some of your friends and/or family will likely have an e-mail program that collects any addresses from incoming messages. That means, when they forward that wonderful e-mail to their entire address book, demanding that it be forwarded on to 15 others, everyone that you sent your message to will get that person’s bulk messages now. Very uncool!
Luckily, there is an extremely easy way to be respectful of your list of e-mail buddies.
ASP.NET “Remember Me” Option with Forms Authentication Not Working?
ASP.NET Login Control
So, you’ve set the timeout value for forms authentication to a fairly large value, yet checking the “remember me” check box on the Login control still does not persist your users’ authentication, even after a fairly short period of inactivity.
<system.web>
...
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms timeout="10080"/>
</authentication>
...
</system.web>
Don’t spend hours trying to figure out why this, seemingly, basic functionality doesn’t perform as it should. The solution to this problem is very simple, albeit somewhat obscure.
Tags: .NET, ASP, development, Security
Posted in Security, Web Development | No comments yet; your thoughts are welcome »
SVN, the Way of the Tortoise
Although, Subversion (SVN) is not new, it is still one of the most widely used version control systems (VCS) available. SVN is a tool that allows users to track the changes of files. Yes, it’s that simple.
Interfacing Your Demons
Like many version control systems, SVN utilizes a command-line interface (CLI) to interact with users. Some users frown upon the command-line; especially, Windows users. However, I want to point out how necessary it is that these tools use the command-line.
After you use a version control system for a good length of time, you should notice that there are routines you follow over and over again. Perhaps you lock certain files before editing them to prevent conflicts with other potential editors on your team. Maybe you always commit your changes when you build a project for release, or when you shut down your computer for the evening. The point is, these are things that can be automated with small scripts through build events or even Windows Task Scheduler. Having a command-line tool is essential to such automation.
On the other hand, there are many times you will want to issue commands to SVN on-demand. A nice graphical user interface can make things much easier and faster for those tasks. Enter TortoiseSVN.
Google Teams with Verizon Wireless
There was an announcement this week about a new alliance between Google and Verizon Wireless. The short of it is, Google and Verizon Wireless (VW) will be working together to deliver several Android-powered devices on the VW network.
Verizon? Open?
Android is an open source mobile operating system (OS). Yeah, open source. That means, you or I can go download the source code for the entire operating system and make changes to it if we please. Android is also an open architecture, in that applications developed for the OS have full-reign. Applications can change anything from the user interface (UI) to how a phone dials a number.
My confusion with this whole deal stems from Verizon Wireless’ past record with one huge issue: control. The company is notorious for locking devices to a mere fraction of their manufacturer’s default functionality. This is always done in order to control the things their customers can do on their network.
VW “customizes” the user interface of nearly all devices sold on their network. These changes are primarily made to prevent you, dear phone owner, from using the features that are built into your phone. That’s right! If you have a phone that was new within the past 3 years or so, it most likely has the capability to install custom ring tones. If you are a VW customer, I guarantee you cannot get custom ring tones on your phone without paying VW a monthly fee, or a per download fee, to get the simplest of tones you may have already downloaded to your computer. That last statement excludes only skilled geeks that hack around these limitations.
Another great “benefit” VW customers gain from the customized user interfaces is slow to unresponsive interfaces. The developers working for VW do not appear to be very talented programmers. The interface of nearly every device I have owned that has been ravaged by these folks is a horribly-performing, gaudy-looking, cluttered mess.
It’s just what Verizon Wireless does to its devices; that is cripple them.
So again, I am astonished at this deal. How in the world will Verizon Wireless maintain a stance of openness with these new Android devices? Will I be able to remove the inevitable garbage that the VW developers will come up with for these devices? Will I be able to browse the Adroid Market/Library and install any application I want to on my device?
What Google Will Not Stand For
Google will simply not stand for Verizon Wireless taking control over devices that make use of the Android OS. I am still concerned about VW’s track record though. I can only see them making every effort to control yet another class of devices. The public does not have access to the actual deal made between the two, but I certainly hope that Google stood by their morals on this one.
Bullies have never done well against Google. A case-and-point is the whole issue with Apple and getting Google Voice on the iPhone. Verizon Wireless is a well-known bully. How will this deal turn out? I guess, we can only wait and see.
The Future of the Mobile Market
If this deal plays out as announced, Verizon Wireless supporting an open device OS without governing it with their domination-nation, the mobile market will spike for the better. The new kid in town (Android) will finally have made enough friends to compete with the popular one (iPhone).
We need more of this kind of competition in order for true innovation to spark the necessary growth in this country (U.S.). We are well behind other countries in the mobile market. Most of Europe enjoys the next generation mobile infrastructure (currently, 4G) years before we begin to see it here. While there may be some provider issues abroad, generally mobile communication is much more affordable than here in the States. Our providers stifle the entire industry with their archaic practices and Band-aid methodologies.
My Final Take
I am actually excited about the deal between Google and Verizon Wireless. I know it seems surprising after reading all the above. The fact is, my family left VW last year for AT&T. I was so sick of the “device-crippling” that I just had to bail. One of the reasons Verizon Wireless has never been known for its cutting-edge devices is mostly due to their locking practices in order to make a buck on every single transaction you initiate from your VW device.
Now, I am unsatisfied with the coverage of AT&T. Granted, it was already second to VW, but it was acceptable for our needs a year ago. Since then, iPhone usage has snowballed and proven my point about our provider infrastructure problems. I feel certain that no matter which provider Apple teamed with, the iPhone would have totally discredited the network upon saturating it with streams of data requests. None of our providers can support that kind of traffic. AT&T is paying that price now.
I’ll switch back to VW for a truly open Android device on a network with the best overall coverage in the country. However, I still feel that all of the underlying infrastructure needs a total makeover. It won’t be long before VW suffers the same fate as AT&T, when an army of new Android users flood their network.
What is your take on this deal?
Kindle 2: An Introduction
Kindle 2
Have you ever prepared for a trip and struggled when deciding which books to take with you? Do you have books that are too big to pack in the car or worry about lugging around? Do you get miles into the trip and wish you brought one of your other books instead?
I’m a software programmer and most of my books are at least 1,000 pages and weigh a couple of pounds. Seriously, these books are huge. Oftentimes, I have found myself in the car a few hours into a trip or even at my destination, and really wished that I had another book that was left home. Well, I finally found a solution.
Introducing the Kindle 2
Image by TW Collins via Flickr
Amazon’s Kindle 2 is a wonderful product. It is an electronic wireless reading device. With it, you can potentially carry about 1,500 books around with you at a time. All those books on the new Kindle 2 would only weigh about 10 ounces! I read my Kindle in one hand and don’t have to worry about flipping pages, or maneuvering the book to see the words in the shadowed cleft where the pages attach to the spine. When I prepare to leave the house, I don’t have to debate with myself over which book deserves to be toted around with me; I just grab my Kindle. There are other benefits of the Kindle that are more than just convenient alternatives to physical books.
Who is it for?
Image via Wikipedia
The Kindle 2 is ideal for any reading enthusiast. If you love books, but are not attached to the physical attributes of them, you will undoubtedly want a Kindle 2. I do have some specific recommendations for types of people that will most likely desire a Kindle the most.
- bookworms that gobble up text like it’s candy (e.g. Aunt Mildred, Cousin Albert, that know-it-all kid next door; a.k.a. Lisa Simpson)
- history, or reference, buffs that want that information at their fingertips (e.g. Professor Zimmer, spelling bee champions, Civil War reenactors, etc.)
- technical devotees looking for a great way to consolidate all their manuals and guides (e.g. software developers, network analysts, electronic repairmen, etc.)
- professionals with a need to constantly look-up codes or hard facts (e.g. building contractors, attorneys, engineers, etc.)
- many more
This is a great gift for graduates heading off to college, people with low mobility, those with diminished eyesight, and friends or family with one hobby; reading.
Prince of Persia “Combo Specialist” Achievement/Trophy
If you are like many Prince of Persia gamers out there, you have tried tons of different combinations of attack combos in the hopes of finding the right set that will award you that special achievement/trophy; the “Combo Specialist”. The good news is, you do not have to perform all 1,602 possible combos, like the task hint may lead you to believe. You only need to pull off 60 of them. Other guides will tell you 62, 63, or even more, but 60 is the magic number (remember, a combo is actually two or more attacks). I have tested this list at least 10 times with a new user profile each time. There are a few rules to keep in mind when trying to achieve this goal.
- A combo cannot kill the enemy. Even the last hit cannot kill your enemy.
- A combo cannot be blocked by the enemy. No part of the combo can be blocked for you to succeed.
- A combo cannot knock an enemy into a wall or off a ledge. If your combo chain is interrupted by an edge animation, it will not count.
- After you successfully complete all 60 combos, you must kill the enemy you are currently fighting before the achievement/trophy is awarded.
| A = Acrobatic; G = Gauntlet; M = Magic; S = Sword | |||
|
|
|
|
Want to Know How I Figured It Out?
How do I know that there are 1,602 total combos? How do I know that 60 of them are required for the “Combo Specialist” achievement/trophy? I wrote a software program to figure it out for me!
That’s right. I could not find a definitive list anywhere on the Net. The official game guide does not even list the exact combos necessary to get the award.
You can read about the program that I wrote on CodeProject.com. If you’re just interested in the code that calculates this award, look near the end of the Contents at the beginning of the article. You can see some very cool screenshots of application too. Hey, while you’re there, vote me a 5 if you like it!
Tags: .NET, development, Gaming
Posted in Desktop Development, Gaming | No comments yet; your thoughts are welcome »
Save the Developers Lost to Microsoft?
Save the Developers was a site dedicated to educating Web surfers about the tremendous failings of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browsers. The site sported a free “badge” for Web developers and webmasters to include on websites to spread the word. “The word” being that Internet Explorer versions prior to 8 ignore all standards for HTML and CSS (the markup used by Web developers to create webpages). Ultimately, users were pleaded with to upgrade to version 8 beta; at least leave version 6 behind and move on to version 7.
So, why all the past-tense in my explanation above? Well, the Save the Developers website (savethedevelopers.org) now redirects to Microsoft’s website for Internet Explorer 7 and 8 beta. At first, one might assume that Microsoft bought the domain for the website and issued the redirect themselves. However, I’m not so sure about that upon some digging.
A whois query for microsoft.com reveals that the owner of that domain is Microsoft Corporation; no surprise there. However, a whois for savethedevelopers.org (and .com) shows the owner to be Conveyor Group. There is only a month left before the domains expire, so who knows. Maybe they succumbed to the financial power of Microsoft.
Tags: development
Posted in Web Development | 2 comments; continue the discussion »
Simpler Robust ASP.NET Providers
I don’t like writing about something that I’m “currently working on” too often. The problem with that is sometimes other things (e.g. life) get in the way of my proposed timelines. All that aside, there are times when the standard SQL web providers are overly complicated for the rest of my database schema. I think it’s great that you can use the same tables for multiple applications. It’s also great that the primary keys for most of the entities are GUIDs, since these are much harder for an unauthorized user to guess.
Sometimes it’s all just too much!
Integration with the Rest of Your Schema
The default implementation of the ASP.NET providers are not ideal for integrating with the rest of your database schema. By that I mean, if you want to include a foreign key to a user’s ID in a table that you’ve created for your application, you’ll have to play by those default rules. Your foreign key will have to be a unique identifier (SQL Server’s GUID data type).
What if I’ve already defined my entire schema and the User ID I had in mind is an integer?
Write Your Own Providers
Something that I truly appreciate with ASP.NET since version 2 are providers. Being able to customize the implementation details of specific pieces of a well-defined machine is empowering. Unfortunately, for the membership, role and profile providers, your data for each will more than likely be interdependent. For example, you cannot use the default SqlMembershipProvider with a custom role provider that does not link to the aspnet_Users table or use a GUID for the User ID when associating roles to users. If you want to change the data type of the primary keys for some entities, you’ll have to write custom providers for all aspects you wish to use in your application.
It’s also not as simple as just changing the data type from a uniqueidentifier to an int. Ideally, the flexibility to configure the providers to use one of your own existing tables in the database would be more robust than hard-coding several table names into the code. What if the provider uses the correct database provider based on the supplied connection string? How about the option to use dynamic SQL or stored procedures?
These would all be very nice features for a set of ASP.NET providers. Of course, I have a real-world example. My host lets me create MySQL databases for my website. They have MySQL 5 installed, which has the ability to create stored procedures (after a bit of a wait). The only trick here is, stored procedures in MySQL 5 are actually stored in the “mysql” database. This can pose a problem for security in a shared hosting environment. Everyone’s stored procedures are in the same “bucket”! It would be great if I could configure my membership and role providers to use MySQL and build dynamic SQL instead of relying on stored procedures.
They’re Coming
That’s the plan. I am currently writing ASP.NET providers that offer all the benefits mentioned above. When will this project be complete? Who knows with my schedule! I can tell you that I have a couple of big websites that I’m working on that will require MySQL as the backing database. They also require membership and roles support. I guess I’ll be finishing the providers in order to complete those websites. ;-)
Tags: .NET, ASP, data, development
Posted in Web Development | No comments yet; your thoughts are welcome »
The preceding is the opinion of the author(s) and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The views of the writer are his own, and do not in any way reflect the views of the site they are posted on, other sites affiliated with this site, the staff involved with the site, or any other members of this site. For more information, review the full Terms of Use for this site.
Categories
Tags
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- September 2005 (1)